<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for </title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thegsport.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thegsport.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on 2009 NFL Draft: Selections and Opinions by More info here</title>
		<link>http://www.thegsport.com/2009-nfl-draft-selections-and-opinions/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>More info here</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 15:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegsport.com/?p=222#comment-22</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;More info here...&lt;/strong&gt;

Keep up the interesting posts!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>More info here&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Keep up the interesting posts!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2009 NFL Mock Draft by George Rodier</title>
		<link>http://www.thegsport.com/2009-nfl-mock-draft/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>George Rodier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 02:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegsport.com/?p=75#comment-14</guid>
		<description>@ Craig: I definitely agree (haven't updated mock since trade). Look for them to possibly draft Clay Matthews. Pettigrew would then fall to the Ravens at 26.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Craig: I definitely agree (haven&#8217;t updated mock since trade). Look for them to possibly draft Clay Matthews. Pettigrew would then fall to the Ravens at 26.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2009 NFL Mock Draft by Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.thegsport.com/2009-nfl-mock-draft/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 02:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegsport.com/?p=75#comment-13</guid>
		<description>With Tony Gonzalez on Atlanta they are going Defense(line or Line Backer)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With Tony Gonzalez on Atlanta they are going Defense(line or Line Backer)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2009 NFL Mock Draft by George Rodier</title>
		<link>http://www.thegsport.com/2009-nfl-mock-draft/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>George Rodier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 22:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegsport.com/?p=75#comment-11</guid>
		<description>@ stevealicious: Not really what WR jokes your talking about?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ stevealicious: Not really what WR jokes your talking about?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2009 NFL Mock Draft by stevealicious</title>
		<link>http://www.thegsport.com/2009-nfl-mock-draft/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>stevealicious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegsport.com/?p=75#comment-10</guid>
		<description>ok seriously? The wide reciever jokes arent funny anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok seriously? The wide reciever jokes arent funny anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2009 NFL Mock Draft by George Rodier</title>
		<link>http://www.thegsport.com/2009-nfl-mock-draft/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>George Rodier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 04:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegsport.com/?p=75#comment-9</guid>
		<description>I don't think you need to worry about the Lions doing something that stupid now that Matt Millen isn't there anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think you need to worry about the Lions doing something that stupid now that Matt Millen isn&#8217;t there anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MVP Race: Odd Man Out by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.thegsport.com/mvp-race-odd-man-out/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 02:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegsport.com/?p=134#comment-8</guid>
		<description>I knew somebody would bring up rebounds, but it's silly to compare rebounds between Wade and LeBron considering one is a guard and one is a forward. It should come as no surprise LeBron has more rebounds.

I also think you give to much credit to LeBron as a good teammate. Don't forget all the times he's made it public he eventually wants out of Cleveland. And just the other night he referred to the other Cav players not as his teammates but rather "the supporting cast".

I honestly think the hype and stigma surrounding LeBron comes from him being such a marketable player.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I knew somebody would bring up rebounds, but it&#8217;s silly to compare rebounds between Wade and LeBron considering one is a guard and one is a forward. It should come as no surprise LeBron has more rebounds.</p>
<p>I also think you give to much credit to LeBron as a good teammate. Don&#8217;t forget all the times he&#8217;s made it public he eventually wants out of Cleveland. And just the other night he referred to the other Cav players not as his teammates but rather &#8220;the supporting cast&#8221;.</p>
<p>I honestly think the hype and stigma surrounding LeBron comes from him being such a marketable player.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MVP Race: Odd Man Out by babcocks</title>
		<link>http://www.thegsport.com/mvp-race-odd-man-out/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>babcocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 01:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegsport.com/?p=134#comment-7</guid>
		<description>While I am not going to argue with several points, you do state something that kind of negates from your point, "Remove LeBron or Kobe from those teams and they would have a much more difficult time getting to the finals. But they would still be good teams. Remove Wade from Miami and the Heat don’t make the playoffs."  Yes, Dwayne Wade is a huge factor for the Heat, and his stats back him up because he has to be the star player.  Dwayne Wade had to carry his team more than the other two, but his stats are bolstered because the rest of his team really isn't a threat.  Not one other person on the Heat averages more than 14 points per game besides Wade.  Plus, add to that Wade is outrebounded by LeBron by over 2 a game.  While that is quite a sizeable point differential, it is a much bigger margin for rebounds.  Plus, while you can't really measure this, I believe that LeBron is a much better leader than Wade.  James is highly supportive of the rest of his team, and as the commentators said in a game 1 against the Pistons, "The Cavaliers feed off of one another's success".  James isn't the team and he supports the rest of his teammates.  I'm not saying that Wade isn't a team player, he just isn't as enthusiastic about the teamwork between himself and his team.  LeBron is not only great himself, he allows other to rise to stardom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I am not going to argue with several points, you do state something that kind of negates from your point, &#8220;Remove LeBron or Kobe from those teams and they would have a much more difficult time getting to the finals. But they would still be good teams. Remove Wade from Miami and the Heat don’t make the playoffs.&#8221;  Yes, Dwayne Wade is a huge factor for the Heat, and his stats back him up because he has to be the star player.  Dwayne Wade had to carry his team more than the other two, but his stats are bolstered because the rest of his team really isn&#8217;t a threat.  Not one other person on the Heat averages more than 14 points per game besides Wade.  Plus, add to that Wade is outrebounded by LeBron by over 2 a game.  While that is quite a sizeable point differential, it is a much bigger margin for rebounds.  Plus, while you can&#8217;t really measure this, I believe that LeBron is a much better leader than Wade.  James is highly supportive of the rest of his team, and as the commentators said in a game 1 against the Pistons, &#8220;The Cavaliers feed off of one another&#8217;s success&#8221;.  James isn&#8217;t the team and he supports the rest of his teammates.  I&#8217;m not saying that Wade isn&#8217;t a team player, he just isn&#8217;t as enthusiastic about the teamwork between himself and his team.  LeBron is not only great himself, he allows other to rise to stardom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Big Risk and Great Opportunity by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.thegsport.com/a-big-risk-and-great-opportunity/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegsport.com/?p=55#comment-6</guid>
		<description>He isn't going to injure their chances, but he isn't going to help them. If anything he's just in the way of them progressing in different aspects. First being scholarships. Using a scholarship on him (an unproven player) could potentially hurt somewhere else. Second, if he does start, it's only for a year one-and-done. He alone isn't going to turn the program around. What he could do, however, is take away valuable playing time and learning from Forcier, a player who could potentially help turn the program around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He isn&#8217;t going to injure their chances, but he isn&#8217;t going to help them. If anything he&#8217;s just in the way of them progressing in different aspects. First being scholarships. Using a scholarship on him (an unproven player) could potentially hurt somewhere else. Second, if he does start, it&#8217;s only for a year one-and-done. He alone isn&#8217;t going to turn the program around. What he could do, however, is take away valuable playing time and learning from Forcier, a player who could potentially help turn the program around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2009 NFL Mock Draft by babcocks</title>
		<link>http://www.thegsport.com/2009-nfl-mock-draft/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>babcocks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegsport.com/?p=75#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Looking at the Detroit Lion's track record, it would only make sense that they pick Michael Crabtree for the overall #1 pick!  8 months ago if I knew that the Detroit Lions were going to get the #1 pick, I would have thought that picking a quarterback would have been a terrible decision.  However, after Kitna somehow has been forgotten, who knows what is going on with Culpepper and Orlovsky, Stafford is probably the right choice for them.  Stafford may not make an immediate impact, but hopefully his presence will be prominent in a few years and hopefully not a bust like Charles Rogers, Mike Williams and company.  Anyways, great mock draft, I can't wait to see how it turns out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking at the Detroit Lion&#8217;s track record, it would only make sense that they pick Michael Crabtree for the overall #1 pick!  8 months ago if I knew that the Detroit Lions were going to get the #1 pick, I would have thought that picking a quarterback would have been a terrible decision.  However, after Kitna somehow has been forgotten, who knows what is going on with Culpepper and Orlovsky, Stafford is probably the right choice for them.  Stafford may not make an immediate impact, but hopefully his presence will be prominent in a few years and hopefully not a bust like Charles Rogers, Mike Williams and company.  Anyways, great mock draft, I can&#8217;t wait to see how it turns out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
